Wednesday, March 31, 2010

When do I get my return?

How do I file for the tax credit? And when do I get my return?
I have been with potential buyers recently who are eligible for the tax credit and have asked this question. The first question is understandable but the second question I was concerned about. They were under the impression that since it is 2010 they had to file for the tax credit on their 2010 taxes (which makes since). This is not the case at all. If you are eligible for the tax credit, and you close on a new home before June 30, 2010 you can file for this tax credit on your 2009 taxes. 
I am not an accountant, so I will not go into to much detail about the actual process of the filing, but if you have already filed your 2009 taxes, you can amend them with the tax credit form. The form you are going to be filing is the 5405 First Time Homebuyers Form (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5405.pdf). If you have not yet filed your taxes you must attach this form with your filing. 
Once you have filed it is only a matter of time until you will receive your tax credit. I am not going to estimate how long it will take the IRS to drop your check in the mail because that would be foolish. There is a great Q & A site on the IRS site that can answer a lot of other questions you might have about this credit. You can get to it by going to: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204671,00.html. 
I hope this is helpful. 

Friday, March 19, 2010

Good Questions from First Time Homebuyers.... Part 1

I am going to start a series of blog posts answering questions that I hear in the field from homebuyers. Many of the questions may be obvious to many of you more experienced homebuyers, but I hear them often enough that they are worth discussing. I don’t want the fear of asking questions to hinder qualified buyers from making a decision to own a home as opposed to renting, so I would like to touch on them here. 
If you have a questions that you would like to have answered we would love to hear it. Send it to us by commenting on the blog or email me at Justin.Core@floridamoves.com.  
First Question:
Should I work exclusively with an agent to buy, or find homes online and call the listing agents on the homes that I like?  - Lorri Doss, Huntsville, AL
This is a good question that a lot of buyers want to ask. The answer on both sides boil down to exclusive representation. Many buyers feel that agents are just trying to make a sale as quickly as they can. What you, as a buyer need to find, is an agent that you know and trust that has your best interest in mind. The problem that sometimes arises with buyers that call agent after agent is there is no consistency in the buying process.
  1. Listing agents are committed to their seller’s best interest first and foremost. 
  2. Buyers without representation have a limited and unrealistic view of the market. 
  3. Limited and delayed information of market activities inhibit them from making educated offers and decisions. 
  4. Sellers that negotiate on their own behalf ultimately pay more for homes due to emotional ties throughout negotiations and not enough information from previous sales.
  5. Once your agent knows what you are looking for, they can alert you to new properties that come on the market.
There are a myriad of reasons to work with a  agent throughout your home-buying process. In the future we will discuss the best way to find an agent that will represent your best interests and how to work with them to find you the best house at the best price.  It takes team work to be as efficient as possible in finding and securing a home. 
Stay tuned for more questions from homebuyers. 

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Vote No On 4


"VOTE NO ON 4" CAMPAIGN LAUNCHES WEB VIDEO ON AMENDMENT 4

Video tells the story of St. Pete Beach, the first town in Florida to adopt a local version of Amendment 4

(Orlando, FL - March 10, 2010) Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy today stepped up its campaign against Amendment 4, launching a web video on St. Pete Beach--the first community in Florida to adopt a local version of the proposed constitutional amendment. The video can be viewed online atwww.florida2010.org.

"St. Pete Beach is proof positive that Amendment 4 doesn't work," said Ryan Houck, executive director of Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy. "This idea has led to higher property tax rates, fewer jobs and endless litigation in St. Pete Beach. It's the last thing Florida needs in the midst of a recession."[i]

While Florida voters are set to soon decide the fate of Amendment 4 - a statewide Vote on Everything initiative - St. Pete Beach voters have already chosen to rein in their own local experiment by a decisive margin.

Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy leads opposition to Amendment 4, coordinating a grassroots network of more than 30 campaign chairs and over 1300 volunteers. To date, more than 220 organizations have opposed Amendment 4. More join the fight every day.

The St. Pete Beach TIMELINE:
November, 2006: St. Pete Beach narrowly adopts a local version of Amendment 4, requiring a referendum for all changes to the local comprehensive plan. Amendment 4 supporters promise that they just want to give "the people a right to vote."

June, 2008: St. Pete Beach voters approve a new comprehensive plan at the ballot box.

June, 2008: After losing the election, Amendment 4 supporters in St. Pete Beach file a string of legal challenges to invalidate the will of the people.

September, 2008: Numerous administrative challenges are subsequently filed by Amendment 4 co-author and co-founder Ross Burnaman.

June, 2009: The St. Petersburg Times reports that St. Pete Beach has exhausted its legal budget months before the end of the fiscal year.[ii]

September, 2009: Amidst rising legal bills, St. Pete Beach raises the property tax rate.[iii]

October, 2009: Court-ordered mediation collapses when Amendment 4 supporters refuse to join the City and the business community in supporting a compromise.[iv]



[i] St. Petersburg Times on September 22, 2009 ("St. Pete Beach tax rates goes up, but will it be felt?"):http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/st-pete-beach-tax-rate-goes-up-but-will-it-be-felt /1038346

[ii] St. Petersburg Times on June 1, 2009 ("St. Pete Beach's legal costs bust budget")

[iii] St. Petersburg Times on September 22, 2009 ("St. Pete Beach tax rates goes up, but will it be felt?"):http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/st-pete-beach-tax-rate-goes-up-but-will-it-be-felt/1038346

[iv] St. Petersburg Times on November 4, 2009 ("Mediator declares impasse in talks to end St Pete Beach development lawsuits"): http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/mediator-declares-impasse-in-talks-to-end-st-pete-beach-development/1049083

For more information go to: http://Florida2010.org
Paid political advertisement - paid for and sponsored by Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy, Inc.,
610 South Blvd, Tampa, FL 33606
No On Amendment 4

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

FHA Announces Policy Changes

This article below outlines changes that are going to be taking place within FHA lending practices. This is just another reason to act now rather than wait on all the adjustments being made in all aspects of the market.


FHA ANNOUNCES POLICY CHANGES TO ADDRESS RISK AND STRENGTHEN FINANCES
New Measures Will Help FHA Better Manage Risk, While Maintaining Support for the Housing Market and Access for Underserved Communities
WASHINGTON – Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner David Stevens today announced a set of policy changes to strengthen the FHA’s capital reserves, while enabling the agency to continue to fulfill its mission to provide access to homeownership for underserved communities. The changes announced today are the latest in a series of changes Stevens has enacted in order to better position the FHA to manage its risk while continuing to support the nation’s housing market recovery.
The FHA will propose to take the following steps: increase the mortgage insurance premium (MIP); update the combination of FICO scores and down payments for new borrowers; reduce seller concessions to three percent, from six percent; and implement a series of significant measures aimed at increasing lender enforcement. U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan previewed the changes in December of last year, noting that the FHA would announce additional details before the end of January.
“Striking the right balance between managing the FHA’s risk, continuing to provide access to underserved communities, and supporting the nation’s economic recovery is critically important,” said Commissioner Stevens. “When combined with the risk management measures announced in September of last year, these changes are among the most significant steps to address risk in the agency’s history. Additionally, by continuing to provide affordable, responsible mortgage products, FHA will support the housing market’s recovery. Importantly, FHA will remain the largest source of home purchase financing for underserved communities.”
Announced FHA Policy Changes:
  1. Mortgage insurance premium (MIP) will be increased to build up capital reserves and bring back private lending
    • The first step will be to raise the up-front MIP by 50 bps to 2.25% and request legislative authority to increase the maximum annual MIP that the FHA can charge.
    • If this authority is granted, then the second step will be to shift some of the premium increase from the up-front MIP to the annual MIP.
    • This shift will allow for the capital reserves to increase with less impact to the consumer, because the annual MIP is paid over the life of the loan instead of at the time of closing
    • The initial up-front increase is included in a Mortgagee Letter to be released tomorrow, January 21st, and will go into effect in the spring.
  2. Update the combination of FICO scores and down payments for new borrowers.
    • New borrowers will now be required to have a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for FHA's 3.5% down payment program. New borrowers with less than a 580 FICO score will be required to put down at least 10%.
    • This allows the FHA to better balance its risk and continue to provide access for those borrowers who have historically performed well.
    • This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February and, after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.
  3. Reduce allowable seller concessions from 6% to 3%
    • The current level exposes the FHA to excess risk by creating incentives to inflate appraised value. This change will bring FHA into conformity with industry standards on seller concessions.
    • This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.
  4. Increase enforcement on FHA lenders
    • Publicly report lender performance rankings to complement currently available Neighborhood Watch data - Will be available on the HUD website on February 1.
      • This is an operational change to make information more user-friendly and hold lenders more accountable; it does not require new regulatory action as Neighborhood Watch data is currently publicly available.
    • Enhance monitoring of lender performance and compliance with FHA guidelines and standards.
      • Implement Credit Watch termination through lender underwriting ID in addition to originating ID.
      • This change is included in a Mortgagee Letter to be released tomorrow, January 21st, and is effective immediately.
    • Implement statutory authority through regulation of section 256 of the National Housing Act to enforce indemnification provisions for lenders using delegated insuring process
      • Specifications of this change will be posted in March, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in early summer.
    • HUD is pursuing legislative authority to increase enforcement on FHA lenders. Specific authority includes:
      • Amendment of section 256 of the National Housing Act to apply indemnification provisions to all Direct Endorsement lenders. This would require all approved mortgagees to assume liability for all of the loans that they originate and underwrite
      • Legislative authority permitting HUD maximum flexibility to establish separate "areas" for purposes of review and termination under the Credit Watch initiative. This would provide authority to withdraw originating and underwriting approval for a lender nationwide on the basis of the performance of its regional branches
In addition to the changes proposed today, the FHA is continuing to review its overall response to housing market conditions, and continuing to evaluate its mortgage insurance underwriting standards and its measures to help distressed and underwater borrowers through FHA/HAMP and other FHA initiatives going forward.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Short Sale Revolution

Read through this article below. This change is currently pending and could revolutionize the short sale process. What it is attempting to do is require a response from lien holders within 10 days. Let me know your thoughts. 


WASHINGTON – Jan. 12, 2010 – The federal government is setting guidelines for short sales of homes, giving lenders a 10-day limit to respond to offers, freeing borrowers from debt and providing financial incentives to lenders.
The new rules seek to address the many criticisms of short sales and figure to play a significant role in South Florida, where distressed properties dominate the market as the housing slump meanders into a fifth year.
“The cloud could be lifted,” said Domenic Faro of the Fort Lauderdale Real Estate firm. “This could bring us back to some normalcy.”
In a short sale, the homeowner unloads the property for less than what’s owed on the mortgage, and the lender forgives the difference. Nearly half of all single-family mortgage holders in Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade counties are “under water,” meaning they owe more than their homes are worth, according to third-quarter data from Zillow.com, a Seattle-based real estate firm.
While short sales are considered the perfect solution for “underwater” homeowners on the verge of foreclosure, the deals often drag on as lenders take weeks or months to respond to offers. Frustrated buyers walk away during the delays. In some cases, lenders insist that borrowers share in the financial loss, holding up the transactions even longer.
To speed up the process, the U.S. Treasury is calling for lenders to respond to short sale offers within 10 business days. Sellers are eligible for $1,500 moving allowances, and they will not be on the hook for repayment of any debt.
Also, lenders will get $1,000 to cover administrative and processing costs, while investors owning the mortgages will receive a maximum $1,000 for allowing up to $3,000 in short sale proceeds to be distributed to less senior lenders. Loan servicers participating in the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program are required to follow the guidelines.
The rules do not specifically apply to loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which represent about half of all U.S. mortgage debt. The two government-run mortgage companies are working to finalize their own guidelines.
The Treasury plan, which must be implemented by lenders no later than April, is meant to help sellers like Dawn Sclafani, who has been waiting since October for her lender to approve a short sale offer on her Margate home. A buyer has offered $155,000, and she owes $233,000.
Sclafani, a 50-year-old psychologist, said she’s eager for the bank to approve the deal so she can put the experience behind her.
“I want to move on … but I can’t until somebody gives me permission to,” she said. “I’ve heard that this is a horrendous process. The banks are just not very cooperative. I do believe these new rules will help.”
U.S. Rep Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton, agrees, saying the guidelines are meant to make short sales “a more usable tool.” Klein points out the rules provide standardized paperwork for all short sales and give buyers and sellers a more reasonable time frame for whether or not the sales will happen.
But Klein and others say the government may have to increase the financial incentives. The $3,000 cap on short sale proceeds is not sitting well with second lien holders, who have been demanding more money from sellers, the first lenders and real estate agents in exchange for releasing their claims and allowing the short sales to proceed.
“This is a great program if all these mortgages had only one lien holder,” said Travis Hamel Olsen, chief operating officer for Loan Resolution Corp., an Arizona company that helps lenders complete short sales. “But many of these properties have two liens.”
Meanwhile, some local real estate agents remain skeptical of the guidelines.
Broward County agent Ron Rosen, who urged Klein last summer to push for new regulations, said he thinks “the banks will still play their little games with people and make life difficult for everyone.”
Edward Goldfarb of RE/MAX PowerPro Realty in Davie doubts the Treasury will enforce the new rules. “There’s no teeth to them,” he said.
A spokeswoman for the Treasury says it will hand down “substantial” penalties to lenders that don’t comply. They can include the withholding or reduction of payments and requiring improperly rejected loans to be modified.
Lenders have blamed short sale delays on the complicated nature of the transactions, sheer numbers of deals and on borrowers who don’t submit proper paperwork in a timely manner.
In many cases, the banks are not to blame, said Ward Kellogg, chief executive of Boca Raton-based Paradise Bank. Still, he thinks the guidelines are necessary to force lenders to clear the market of so many distressed properties.
“I think the pressure on (the banks) is a good thing,” Kellogg said.
Copyright © 2010 Sun Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Paul Owers. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Now Is The Time!

Starting the first quarter of 2010 we have had an incredible push forward to continue the strength of the housing market from the fourth quarter 2009. Prices, in Orlando area, have continued to slowly rebound and stabilize, and the average days on the market has continued to fall. Buyers are becoming wisely competitive and sellers, in many cases, have resolved to a stark understanding of pricing. In Seminole County we are seeing a supply of home around 7.7 months of inventory. For comparison purposes, in “Boom” times the Orlando Regional Realtors Board (ORRA) reports a low of 1.15 months in April of 2005, and a high of 31.64 months in January of 2008. Undoubtedly, we are heading in the right direction. 

Now the sobering subject of availability of funds. The funds have been readily available for the last year for credit worthy borrowers. This packaged with the homebuyers tax credit and low rates have been a now brainer for many borrowers. With this availability accompanied with consumer confidence continuing to rise, as well as prices still falling slightly, borrowed funds are forced to rise. It goes back to the basic laws of supply and demand. There is simply not enough funds for every American to buy property with 4.5% interest rates. Interest rates are the hedge against this type of predicament. 

Freddie Mac is projecting rates to move from just over five percent today for 30-year loans to over 6 percent or higher later in 2010. The Federal Reserve has also scheduled a phase-down of its multi-billion dollar purchases of mortgage backed securities. The point of all this is to note that if you are considering purchasing, or selling, you need to get serious now. Buyers will see a tremendous increase in cost, and sellers will see a decrease in buyers due to availability of funding. Now is the time to purchase or sell while rates are low and prices are stabling. Competition is low between sellers and everyone benefits from the new extended and expanded tax credit. Lock down your financing now and don’t wait. 

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Best Bites in Oviedo (Part 1)

My family and I moved here to Oviedo in 1994 when I was still a little guy. Coming originally from Alabama it was in our blood to find the local favorites, because the day revolves around what for breakfast, lunch, & dinner. To this day I find it humurous everytime I am sitting at an early breakfast, and the discussion is about where we are eating lunch. Nonetheless, we found the places to eat.

The first place we stumbled upon was "Big John's." When my youngest brother was born my dad made it a new year's resolution to take my brother and I to Big John's every Friday for breakfast to spend a little more quality time with us. This started almost 13 years ago, and it has been a rare event that any of us have missed. Big John's offers a full breakfast special including eggs, pancakes, and bacon for about $3. This isn't all they offer but it's pretty much the only thing I've ever ordered.

Big John's is on 434 in downtown Oviedo just past the Post Office. Don't let the outside fool you, the food is excellent, and the people are great. Also, just so you're not surprised Big John has now become Big Joe since we have been going there.

Stay tuned for the next local restaurant. This one is where we have our Monday morning Core Group meetings...